REPARTMIENT OF THE NAVY
BUARD FOR GURRECTION UF NAVAL REGURUS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 4004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Gy
St ee .. o . . ; EGA
Docket No: 8524-14
22 January 2025
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 21
July 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised
in our letter of 17 November 2011, that your application had
been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-.
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. The names and
yotes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the jetter you submitted, even
though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously congidered by
the Board within one year from the Gate of the Board’s decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a cor
rden is on the app
r or injustice.
Sincerely, a
GET. a
i; furl
BERT J
naval record, the bu
axistence of probable material erro
be
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14_Redacted
your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the letter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8101 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. consequentiy, when applying for naval record, the burden is on t existence of probable material a correction of an orth he applicant © error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00226-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07193-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03003-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2010. The discharge authority directed the execution of your BCD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7200 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2015. With that being said, the Board further concluded that in accordance with regulatory guidelines, your “terminal leave” did not factor into the time you actually served on active duty and therefore should not have been calculated as time served. Consequently, when appliing for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11859-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00343-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the mental evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2573 14
States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 18 March 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied, It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently,...